![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
“These are the times that try men's souls.“ And when my soul is tried I must vent my spleen. -JR
I, like most of our country's founding fathers, believe that we should have a tiny federal government. (And what little government we have, should stay the hell out of our lives!)
The IRS is threatening to hold non-profit organizations liable for the comments made by visitors to their websites and by the actions of organizations to which the websites have links. "Guilty" organizations would be stripped of their tax-exempt status.The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) acting on its own initiative, without legislative authorization, is considering "the necessity of issuing guidance that would clarify the application of the Internal Revenue Code to use of the Internet by tax-exempt organizations". In short, the IRS wants to monitor and regulate free speech on the Internet.
Organizations may be held liable for the activities of other organizations over whom they have neither control or internal knowledge of operations. Organizations may also be held liable for the speech of individual comments made online at their websites.
Tax-exempt (non-profit) organizations are required by law to restrict lobbying activities to a minimum, or lose their tax-exempt status. Those that take the IRS (h) election are allowed to allocate a small percentage of their revenues to lobbying activities.
Clarifying an intention to regulate speech, the IRS announcement includes many questions under consideration regarding regulation of the use of the Internet by non-profit, tax exempt organizations. These are a few:
The effect of IRS regulation and monitoring of Internet sites--no doubt with the threat of hefty fines for infringements--will seriously limit public discourse and freedom of speech. Even if the website is eventually found to be innocent of an IRS charge, damage to the organization will be extensive: in lawyer fees, temporary or long-term loss of the website, and energy directed away from operations to focus on securing exoneration.To what extent are statements made by subscribers to a forum, such as a listserv or newsgroup, attributable to an exempt organization that maintains the forum?
Does providing a hyperlink on a charitable organization's website to another organization that engages in political campaign intervention result in per se prohibited political intervention?
Does providing a hyperlink to the website of another organization that engages in lobbying activity constitute lobbying by a charitable organization?
Unlike other publications of an exempt organization, a website may be modified on a daily basis. To what extent and by what means should an exempt organization maintain the information from prior versions of the organization's website? Members of Congress are also concerned. Rep. Dick Armey chastised the IRS' request for comments saying, "The IRS has no business getting involved in whether a think tank has links on its website, or how often a charity's site is updated. The idea of turning the tax man into a net cop would have a chilling effect on free speech on the Internet" (Tech Law Journal, 10/26/00)
What you can, and should, do! As most regulations, this attack on yet another one of our RIGHTS is open for public comment. I suggest you comment, and comment profusely! We have until February 13, 2001, (That's just a few weeks!), to show our displeasure with this behavior.
Send your comments about the IRS Announcement 2000-84, Dated October 16 to:Tell Ms. Kindell politely, but forcibly, to keep her hands off our Bill of Rights. And suggest she run the 2000-84 document through Bill Klinton's shredder.
Internal Revenue Service
1111 Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20224
Attn: Judith E. Kindell
If you don't have a stamp, call the Capital Switchboard at 202-224-3121 or FREE at 1-800-648-3516, and speak your mind about the IRS document 2000-84. (Please remember to referance the document number) Start your monolog with something like:
"This is about the IRS document number two-thousand -dash- eighty-four, dated October sixteenth"... then show your outrage!If you call, you might want to followup your phone call with some snail-mail. Phone messages can be erased, but your letter has to be read and filed somewhere.
( Sacrifice a tree and save your rights!)
View the IRS's 2000-84 document Here
Click Here For a sample letter.
Click here to return to the main "Firearms" page, or select a new category fron the left.If you find this web site useful in your search for information tell your friends. If you have some web sites that you think I should include please email jr@jrwhipple.com and I will consider adding them to this site. If you find any broken links please let me know, so I can fix them.
This site is brought to you by...
![]()
J.R. Whipple & Associates
Over 25 Years in the Computer Business!
We build the Best Computers on Earth.
_______________________________________
Click the globe to visit us!![]()